This poses an interesting question then. With this, we could, in
theory dump the ON userland, and go pure GNU, more inline with the
other Debian/Ubuntu ports. That being said, I still feel diversity is
a strength, and is it still Solaris if we dump the userland (and with
it, binary and script compability?)
Michael

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:07 PM, David Bartley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Michael Casadevall
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The kFreeBSD port has had a lot of considerable issues with porting
>> software. Remember, we'd need to port the ON tools such as the ZFS
>> admin tools to glibc.
>
> I already have zfs and zpool binaries linked and working against glibc
> (see [0]). Most of the OpenSolaris-specific extensions are trivial
> wrappers around syscalls, so I've simply reimplemented them in my
> port.
>
> -- David
>
> [0] http://csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~dtbartle/opensolaris/on-glibc.tar.gz
>
_______________________________________________
gnusol-devel mailing list
gnusol-devel@lists.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel

Reply via email to