From: "Santosh Helekar" <chimbel...@yahoo.com>
--- On Sat, 4/24/10, Ivo da C.Souza <icso...@bsnl.in> wrote:
**I did not refer to "money scams" of (Dr.) Dana Ullman, but to his >knowledge of homeopathy, since he has books on homeopathic. **Let it be clear once for all: I never said that I agreed with Dana Ullman in the blank statement that "Western medicine is not scientific". I do agree in the limits of modern medicine and its side effects. I do not need medical training in Goa Medical College to assess these facts.
Furthermore, Ullman cannot be referred to as Dr. Ullman merely on the basis that he has books on homeopathy. One has to be appropriately educated and qualified to have that prefix attached to his/her name...
**I am not speaking about Ullman's medical qualifications. I do not know about them. But his knowledge of homeopathy seems to be good. Fr.Joseph Britto, SJ, has written books on homeopathy and is practising homeopathy. Cannot he be called a homeopath? Cannot he be better than many homeopaths, trained in the medical colleges? Can Dr.Santosh write books on homeopathy? He is confused and will make confusion worse confounded...

Dr.Gilbert will be quite honest in his work, as he is honest in the assessment of modern medicine. Regarding Gilbert, he has contributed nothing to this discussion after simply providing a link to the Huffington Post article. If in providing that link entitled "How scientific is modern medicine really?", he was claiming that modern medicine was not really scientific, as opposed to homeopathy and other healing rituals, then Gilbert would be anything but honest on this matter.
**Dr.Santosh is really confused. Dr.Gilbert DOES ACCEPT the limits of modern Western medicine. He brought his readers to such an awareness. I would correct Dr.Santosh on two scores: Modern medicine is scientific. Homeopathy is scientific, it has its own methodology. Both medical systems have their own plus and minus points. Homeopathy has nothing to do with "religion, faith, superstitious beliefs, subjective feelings and healing rituals".

<<Fr. Ivo and Admin Noronha will not understand this because of their scientific illiteracy, and unfamiliarity with modern medicine, but Dr. Gilbert ought to know that modern medicine is eminently scientific because it strictly follows the self-critical scientific method of falsification by observation or experimentation, and it rests on the solid foundations of basic hard sciences, namely physics, chemistry and biology, fully consistent with all their well-established principles. **All of us know it. We know also its limits, which Dr.Santosh (boasting of his "scientific literacy") does not know. He goes on repeating "ad nauseam" his slogans... It is unscientific to call us "scientifically illiterate"... Since he does not have a thorough knowledge of Reality, he can be called a "pseudo-scientist"--in the name of Science he goes on denying what is beyond Science...
Regards.
Fr.Ivo

Reply via email to