hi, On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <m...@pooteeweet.org> wrote: > > On 23.03.2010, at 23:04, Andi Gutmans wrote: > >> What about defining a release manager for the next release? I think that >> is an important aspect of moving things forward. I also thought the dual >> RM in PHP 5.3 worked quite well although it is not necessarily a must. > > > Yeah, lets get that clarified. Derick has stepped up and seems quite > committed and nobody seemed to oppose him RMing the next release. In case he > feels he needs support he can propose a co-RM, after all its important that > the two RM's know and trust each other well so that they can speak with a > consistent voice.
As I think it is still a bit early to design RMs, I am still in favour of David and you. Or David and someone else with good communication skills. You suggested Chris and I think he could do a great job. My only worry is his time availability. But I'm definitively not in favour of Derick, he has been a RM already, let give newer people a chance. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
