I may have to do that, but I'll have to swap out the CPU as well (and maybe
memory).  Could be pricey, but I need the stability.  If that's what it
takes.

Any recommendations on an Intel motherboard, chipset, CPU combination that
supports 4 PCI slots?  PVR-500 requires 3.3 volt support, as I recall.

--

Rich Kadel
Appeligo, Inc.
(858) 433-1747
www.appeligo.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Barnett
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:13 PM
To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver
Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several
hours...no clues



DMA issues should only occur when the card is actually in use.  However,
I want to warn you, I had DMA issues with merely one PVR-500 and a
PVR-350!

I had these problems with three different VIA chipsets, and they utterly
vanished when I moved to an Intel chipset.  VIA forums are rife with
complaints about said chips.

With a box that has 4 tuner cards in it, trying a different motherboard
shouldn't be an issue.  A swap out should take 10-15 minutes....

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:50:45 -0800
"Rich Kadel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Follow-up to Brad Barnett's message:
> 
> As a result of Hans' recommendation, I upgraded to 0.10.0rc1 (actually,
> to a subversion version that included his recent patch for the VBI
> messages also discussed in this thread).  The system got a lot more
> stable.  A few days of up-time in a row.
> 
> But after 3-4 days, it crashed again with the same symptoms.  (Ping
> working, but nothing else, and no messages.)  I suspect you may be right
> about the DMA load, so I shut down one of the two-tuner cards a couple
> of days ago, and today I removed the card completely.  And I'm only
> reading video from one of the 6 tuners now.  (The rest are doing VBI
> only.)  We'll see if this makes a difference.
> 
> Out of curiosity, does the DMA load only happen when an application is
> actively reading from the card?  That is, did I need to physically
> remove it?  Or was it good enough to just stop reading from the card?
> 
> (from an earlier post of mine)
> > FYI, Yes, it is VIA.  Specifically, an ASUS SK8V motherboard, VIA
> > K8T800
> chipset.
> > We'll see how 0.10.0rc1 works, and if not, I'll try removing one of
> > the
> cards.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rich
> 
> --
> 
> Rich Kadel
> Appeligo, Inc.
> (858) 433-1747
> www.appeligo.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Barnett
> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:34 PM
> To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver
> Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after
> several hours...no clues
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Rich,
> 
> 4 PVR 500s is a heavy DMA load for any system.  What motherboard does
> this system employ?  What chipset does the motherboard have?
> 
> VIA chipsets, for example, are particularly prone to DMA issues.  A
> lockup due to a DMA issue can cause all sorts of issue, including your
> hard drive going offline.. which can account for the kernel being able
> to respond to a ping, but do little else.
> 
> If you want to verify such a problem (and you have the ram for it), a
> quick test would be to use knoppix loaded into ram (or other ram based
> distro).  This way, if the drives go MIA, you will still be able to ssh
> in and check things out.
> 
> There are many other things that can be done, including quite a few
> debugging options you can turn on in the kernel.  You could try a serial
> console, for example.... and this would allow you to see kernel messages
> before the lockup.
> 
> 
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:58:49 -0800
> "Rich Kadel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Kernel: 2.6.18.6
> > IVTV: 0.8.2
> > CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 146 (Family: 15, Model: 39, Stepping:
> > 1)
> > 
> > I have a "generic" 4U AMD Opteron server that was running fine for
> > long periods until I started using the IVTV driver.  It's a CentOS 4.3
> > system.  I was using the default 2.6.9 kernel, but ran into this
> > problem, so I upgraded to 2.6.18 and installed ITVT 0.8.2.  Same
> > problem:
> > 
> > After anywhere between 6 hours and 2 days, I can no longer ssh into my
> > system.  Oddly, I CAN ping the system.  If I bring up a monitor, the
> > monitor is showing static, like the video card is messed up. My IVTV
> > applications normally generate output, so I can see when the last file
> > was modified (after rebooting, of course), and that is the only good
> > way I know when it crashed.
> > 
> > I have had ITVT problems/crashes before, on my Dell 2850, but that
> > always gave me a kernel panic and dump so I could see a little of what
> > was going on.  With this system and problem, I get nothing in the logs
> > at the time of the crash.  Occasionally, I will see this error, but it
> > does not always appear between crashes, so it doesn't appear to be the
> > problem
> > 
> > Feb 11 03:30:11 server2 kernel: ivtv3: All encoder VBI stream buffers
> > are full. Dropping data.
> > Feb 11 03:30:11 server2 kernel: ivtv3: Cause: the application is not
> > reading fast enough.
> > 
> > I have 4 PVR-500 cards in this system.  All 8 tuners are capturing
> > VBI.  3 tuners are simultaneously recording low-res video by piping
> > /dev/video[n] to ffmpeg and translating it to .flv.  Up until the time
> > of the "crash", things appear to be recording smoothly.
> > 
> > I assume ping works because the system hasn't actually died
> > completely, and that's probably why I'm not seeing any kernel
> > messages.
> > 
> > Is there a way to debug this?  Perhaps a SLIGHTLY more verbose output?
> > 
> > (I'd hate to create an enormous log file when it might not crash for a
> > couple of days again, but if there is a reasonable and helpful debug
> > flag, I'll try it.)
> > 
> > I've attached the ivtv init log messages.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rich
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Rich Kadel
> > Appeligo, Inc.
> > (858) 433-1747
> > www.appeligo.com
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ivtv-devel mailing list
> ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org
> http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ivtv-devel mailing list
> ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org
> http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel

_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel


_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel

Reply via email to