On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:28:53 -0800
"Rich Kadel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I may have to do that, but I'll have to swap out the CPU as well (and
> maybe memory).  Could be pricey, but I need the stability.  If that's
> what it takes.
> 
> Any recommendations on an Intel motherboard, chipset, CPU combination
> that supports 4 PCI slots?  PVR-500 requires 3.3 volt support, as I
> recall.
> 

You couldn't swap that box with your desktop, for example, for a few days?
 Anything to debug...

> --
> 
> Rich Kadel
> Appeligo, Inc.
> (858) 433-1747
> www.appeligo.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Barnett
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:13 PM
> To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver
> Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after
> several hours...no clues
> 
> 
> 
> DMA issues should only occur when the card is actually in use.  However,
> I want to warn you, I had DMA issues with merely one PVR-500 and a
> PVR-350!
> 
> I had these problems with three different VIA chipsets, and they utterly
> vanished when I moved to an Intel chipset.  VIA forums are rife with
> complaints about said chips.
> 
> With a box that has 4 tuner cards in it, trying a different motherboard
> shouldn't be an issue.  A swap out should take 10-15 minutes....
> 
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:50:45 -0800
> "Rich Kadel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Follow-up to Brad Barnett's message:
> > 
> > As a result of Hans' recommendation, I upgraded to 0.10.0rc1
> > (actually, to a subversion version that included his recent patch for
> > the VBI messages also discussed in this thread).  The system got a lot
> > more stable.  A few days of up-time in a row.
> > 
> > But after 3-4 days, it crashed again with the same symptoms.  (Ping
> > working, but nothing else, and no messages.)  I suspect you may be
> > right about the DMA load, so I shut down one of the two-tuner cards a
> > couple of days ago, and today I removed the card completely.  And I'm
> > only reading video from one of the 6 tuners now.  (The rest are doing
> > VBI only.)  We'll see if this makes a difference.
> > 
> > Out of curiosity, does the DMA load only happen when an application is
> > actively reading from the card?  That is, did I need to physically
> > remove it?  Or was it good enough to just stop reading from the card?
> > 
> > (from an earlier post of mine)
> > > FYI, Yes, it is VIA.  Specifically, an ASUS SK8V motherboard, VIA
> > > K8T800
> > chipset.
> > > We'll see how 0.10.0rc1 works, and if not, I'll try removing one of
> > > the
> > cards.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rich
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Rich Kadel
> > Appeligo, Inc.
> > (858) 433-1747
> > www.appeligo.com
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Barnett
> > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:34 PM
> > To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver
> > Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after
> > several hours...no clues
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Rich,
> > 
> > 4 PVR 500s is a heavy DMA load for any system.  What motherboard does
> > this system employ?  What chipset does the motherboard have?
> > 
> > VIA chipsets, for example, are particularly prone to DMA issues.  A
> > lockup due to a DMA issue can cause all sorts of issue, including your
> > hard drive going offline.. which can account for the kernel being able
> > to respond to a ping, but do little else.
> > 
> > If you want to verify such a problem (and you have the ram for it), a
> > quick test would be to use knoppix loaded into ram (or other ram based
> > distro).  This way, if the drives go MIA, you will still be able to
> > ssh in and check things out.
> > 
> > There are many other things that can be done, including quite a few
> > debugging options you can turn on in the kernel.  You could try a
> > serial console, for example.... and this would allow you to see kernel
> > messages before the lockup.
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:58:49 -0800
> > "Rich Kadel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Kernel: 2.6.18.6
> > > IVTV: 0.8.2
> > > CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 146 (Family: 15, Model: 39, Stepping:
> > > 1)
> > > 
> > > I have a "generic" 4U AMD Opteron server that was running fine for
> > > long periods until I started using the IVTV driver.  It's a CentOS
> > > 4.3 system.  I was using the default 2.6.9 kernel, but ran into this
> > > problem, so I upgraded to 2.6.18 and installed ITVT 0.8.2.  Same
> > > problem:
> > > 
> > > After anywhere between 6 hours and 2 days, I can no longer ssh into
> > > my system.  Oddly, I CAN ping the system.  If I bring up a monitor,
> > > the monitor is showing static, like the video card is messed up. My
> > > IVTV applications normally generate output, so I can see when the
> > > last file was modified (after rebooting, of course), and that is the
> > > only good way I know when it crashed.
> > > 
> > > I have had ITVT problems/crashes before, on my Dell 2850, but that
> > > always gave me a kernel panic and dump so I could see a little of
> > > what was going on.  With this system and problem, I get nothing in
> > > the logs at the time of the crash.  Occasionally, I will see this
> > > error, but it does not always appear between crashes, so it doesn't
> > > appear to be the problem
> > > 
> > > Feb 11 03:30:11 server2 kernel: ivtv3: All encoder VBI stream
> > > buffers are full. Dropping data.
> > > Feb 11 03:30:11 server2 kernel: ivtv3: Cause: the application is not
> > > reading fast enough.
> > > 
> > > I have 4 PVR-500 cards in this system.  All 8 tuners are capturing
> > > VBI.  3 tuners are simultaneously recording low-res video by piping
> > > /dev/video[n] to ffmpeg and translating it to .flv.  Up until the
> > > time of the "crash", things appear to be recording smoothly.
> > > 
> > > I assume ping works because the system hasn't actually died
> > > completely, and that's probably why I'm not seeing any kernel
> > > messages.
> > > 
> > > Is there a way to debug this?  Perhaps a SLIGHTLY more verbose
> > > output?
> > > 
> > > (I'd hate to create an enormous log file when it might not crash for
> > > a couple of days again, but if there is a reasonable and helpful
> > > debug flag, I'll try it.)
> > > 
> > > I've attached the ivtv init log messages.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rich
> > > 
> > > --
> > > 
> > > Rich Kadel
> > > Appeligo, Inc.
> > > (858) 433-1747
> > > www.appeligo.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > ivtv-devel mailing list
> > ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org
> > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > ivtv-devel mailing list
> > ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org
> > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ivtv-devel mailing list
> ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org
> http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ivtv-devel mailing list
> ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org
> http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel

_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel

Reply via email to