Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Good to know I'm not the only one that's considered the capture
quality to be sub-par. Of course, my issue has been all along on the
-250's capture resolution. If you look through my posts from over a
year ago, I looked into it quite a bit. If you're looking for a way
to objectively determine resolution, I put together a test clip DVD
image from stuff I found on the 'net. In particular, the EIA1596 B&W
test pattern is good to determing lines of resolution. A DVD-burnable
image for NTSC (and an untested PAL) is here:
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/mythtvstuff/
Outstanding. I've grabbed that and will run some tests when I get
back from sitting around the pool for a bit. I forgot I also have the
Digital Video Essentials DVD which whould also probably be good source
material (although I have to get it back from my dad). Thanks for
slapping me with the obvious!
Bry
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
