timothy driscoll wrote:
so I would argue against putting a visible, active Jmol on your home page, for example
>, until you can run some basic compatibility checks.
I worry about this on the new Jmol test page. Is that page set up to detect the absense of capability to run the applet? Or does it just look
bad when the capability isn't there?
Bob
--
Robert M. Hanson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 507-646-3107 Professor of Chemistry, St. Olaf College 1520 St. Olaf Ave., Northfield, MN 55057 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
