> >Anyway, I could think of a core that boots without glibc and loads > >glibc 2.0.7 for floppy releases and glibc whatever for CD, HD et > >al... > > I think supporting 3 different c-libraries at a time will cause lots of > problems for users, and for the developers supporting them. I'd prefer > to drop support for the ancient glibc-2.0.7.
Can we provide glibc-2.0.7 as a "compatability library", the way RedHat does, so if necessary, folks can run old code without worrying about re-compiles or crashes? I'd like to have a system that could potentially support more than one c library. 2.2.x for current work, 2.0.7 for older, existing LRP packages, and perhaps uClibc (or newlib, tinylibc, or similar) for core floppy or boot-strap features. Anyone know what details have to be dealt with to have multiple c libraries on the system at the same time? Charles Steinkuehler http://lrp.steinkuehler.net http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror) _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel