YES, I like it. On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Carl Cox <ct...@getgoin.net> wrote:
> <<I like the two suggestions I received. Thank you. I will start using > the suggested approach instead of my current approach. I agree, it's > misleading to have unconnected people linked as siblings.>> > > A couple of thoughts. I have a tag to designate unlinked individuals and > groups. Also, using the tree finder, it would be easy to find all the > unlinked trees, and they can also be tagged from there. > > Carl > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp> > Archived messages: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp> > To unsubscribe: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp> > -- Bob Arens Vice President & Chief Financial Officer EagleVisions Energy LLC www.eaglevisionsenergy.com 1-952-430-7000
