On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 07:02, you wrote: > John, It really wasn't intended to be quite so serious. But since you > mention it, I am not convinced that they do understand. I'm sure that we > have all seen the interviews with x-MS'ers that speak to the fact that > they may well be this disconnected. Of course my paranoid side wants to
I tend to think a good number below the top levels are: they'd be likely to believe what the bosses say. If you're right and Gates, Ballmer etc don't understand, then maybe we don't have much to worry about. I really don't think many people will be going back, and those who've made the move will continue to evangelise. Which is more effective: word of mouth, or paid advertising? > believe that it's all a play on words to get the community to believe > that Linux is insecure, unmanageable and evil. Well! I reallh do hope Bill can't manage it;-) -- Cheers John Summerfield Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/ Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb
