On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Chris Brandt <chris.bra...@renesas.com> wrote: > On Friday, April 28, 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> > In the RZ/A1 HW manual you can kind of see that in 54.18 Port Control >> Logical Diagram (but that wasn't obvious to me at first). >> >> Please, post a link to it or copy essential parts.
> The schematic is included in the "User's manual" > https://www.renesas.com/en-us/doc/products/tool/doc/003/r20ut2596ej_r7s72100evum.pdf Not that one I would like to see... > The RZ/A1H Hardware manual is here: > https://www.renesas.com/en-us/document/hw-manual?hwLayerShowFlg=true&prdLayerId=186374&layerName=RZ%252FA1H&coronrService=document-prd-search&hwDocUrl=%2Fen-us%2Fdoc%2Fproducts%2Fmpumcu%2Fdoc%2Frz%2Fr01uh0403ej0300_rz_a1h.pdf&hashKey=54f335753742b5add524d4725b7242e6 > > Chapter 54 is the port/pin controller. > > "54.18 Port Control Logical Diagram" is the diagram I was talking about. Note > that is says "Note: This figure shows the logic for reference, not the > circuit." > > "54.3.13 Port Bidirection Control Register (PBDCn)" is the magic register > needed to get some pins to work. This is useful. Thanks. >> I'm quite skeptical that cheap hardware can implement something more >> costable than simplest open-source / open-drain + bias > > I don't think this is an open-source / open-drain + bias issue. It's a "the > internal signal paths are not getting hooked up correctly" issue. Had you read the following, esp. Note there? * @PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_ENABLE: enable the pin's input. Note that this does not * affect the pin's ability to drive output. 1 enables input, 0 disables * input. For me manual is clearly tells about this settings: "This register enables or disables the input buffer while the output buffer is enabled." > Regardless, on this part, we needed a way to flag that some pins when put in > some function modes needed 'an extra register setting'. At first we tried to > sneak that info in with a simple #define in the pin/pinmux DT node > properties. But, Linus didn't want it there so we had to make up a new > generic property called "bi-directional". > > What is your end goal here? Get "bi-directional" changed to something else? My goal is to reduce amount of (useless) entities. See Occam's razor for details. Linus, for me it looks like better to revert that change, until we will have clear picture why existing configuration parameters can't work. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
