On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 06:56:09PM -0500, Jeremy Nelson wrote: > Judy Arrays is a modern associative array data structure. > http://judy.sourceforge.net/ They could be used as a > drop-in replacement for alists, which are unpopular with > some people because of the slow insert and delete times. > > Pro: There is no beating judy for performance
As I found from sources, Associated Lists is used for this: - crypt list - ignore list - logfiles list - window list (Though, I may be missing something) Jeremy, do you think that replacing alists with Jlists will give EPIC better performance? Personally, I use 1 or 2 persons for crypto list, 0 for ignore, about 15 slots for logfiles and 7-10 for windows. I think there will be no *noticeable* performance jump, probably only if one script a benchmark. And also I think that no one use EPIC with huge amount of above-listed things, therefor there will be no advantage :-( Am I wrong somewhere? _______________________________________________ List mailing list List@epicsol.org http://epicsol.org/mailman/listinfo/list
