> > > (I think it also inlines a patch Stephen sent on jan 23 which > > > wasn't yet in ltp cvs) > > > > As far as I can tell, no one has merged the two patches that I sent > > earlier, which explains why you are still seeing failures (the one patch > > I sent added permissions needed for the tests). I've seen no reply to > > my patches, although I've seen other patches responded to.
Oh Yes. I merged them today. Please be confident that all your patches will go before the next release is made, though it may be a bit delayed not for any fault of yours, but for mine. I was bit busy investigating somethings else. > > Actually, I see that your patch does include the permissions from my > patch (still not sure why my patch hasn't been merged), so I don't know > why you'd still be seeing failures. I only get 3 failures with my > patch applied, on inherit and fdreceive (due to Fedora 8 policy granting > fd:use permission liberally to all domains) and on task_create (due to > the refpolicy granting process:fork to all domains), so I would only > expect you to get 2 failures after your patch. > > Debugging failures generally requires a copy of your audit.log entries > generated during the tests, and can sometimes benefit from manually > running individual tests as per the README so that you can see more > output. The ltp logfiles may lack some diagnostic output because > policy may not be allowing the test domains to write to whatever type > the log file happens to have (depends on where you install the ltp). > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
