Bo Peng wrote: > During a fast-evolving period like this, with no public release in > between, reversion of lyx2lyx is IMHO acceptable
I think we discussed this sufficiently now. It doesn't matter in which release perdiod we are. Jürgen
Bo Peng wrote: > During a fast-evolving period like this, with no public release in > between, reversion of lyx2lyx is IMHO acceptable
I think we discussed this sufficiently now. It doesn't matter in which release perdiod we are. Jürgen