On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 02:04:36AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >> > And now this seems to be broken. Have a look at the attached shots. > > What is broken? mail-archive.com doesn't list your mail.
Aren't you supposed to be subscribed to the devel list? > I rechecked what I have done and the only thing that might be a > problem is the decreased width of the textedit fields. No, you broke the dialog because resizing was not working anymore and translated strings were truncated and thus only partially shown. > >> the problem that the reported bug is not bug, but consequence of the fact > >> that first two and last two combos are not part groupbox, so the width > >> is a bit bigger. i didnt see the way how to fix it, so escaped from it ;) > > > > So, can we revert r33783 ? > > Why have you reverted my change? It fixed the misalignment of the > text edits and their width can also be increased if necessary. You simply astonish me. I didn't revert your change but simply restored the resizing capability. > It is not OK to revert things without contacting the author. Again, I didn't revert anything but simply fixed what you messed up. I replied to your change, informing you that you had broken the dialog, and you simply ignored that. That is what is not OK, IMHO. > Moreover, why not considering that the existing layout can be > improved? I am really baffled by your statements. That is precisely what I did. > I therefore reverted the reversion and increased the text edit field widths. > If the problem was another one please inform me. I should have missed something here, as I didn't know that you were the release manager with the power of reverting things without contacting the author. This is a very harsh behavior. -- Enrico
