On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 02:57:58PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 07:12, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Tommaso, any thoughts? Even if you don't have time to implement
> > something yourself, your opinion would be useful.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> AFAICR, boundary checks on existing fields of that form, like the
> converter file cache expiry time, are all independent/orthogonal of
> thehardening patch. I assume it's all good to check the values
> and don't allow to save if the inserted values are wrong.
> 
> Actually, I just confirmed the weird behavior in setting a negative
> value and getting back a non-sense positive one, so I just pushed
> a fix for this [1].
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>       T.

Thanks, Tommaso.

Scott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to