On úterý 24 duben 2001 21:51 you wrote: > > 3.TeXmacs comes with the Guile/Scheme extension > > language. > > Hmmm... we'll almost certainly end up with Python. Asger has > already shown about 3 years ago that Python can be embedded in > a couple of lines. The problem is more a matter of "should we, > yet?" YES! Than I would be able to get my beloved transpose-characters function, which nobody cares to implement in LyX. Matej
- Re: [OT] TeXmacs? Niklas Werner
- Re: [OT] TeXmacs? Stefano Ghirlanda
- Re: [OT] TeXmacs? Andre Poenitz
- Re[2]: [OT] TeXmacs? Guenter Milde
- Re: Re[2]: [OT] TeXmacs? Andre Poenitz
- Re: [OT] TeXmacs? Allan Rae
- Re: [OT] TeXmacs? (or Maxima & LyX) Tuukka Toivonen
- Re: [OT] TeXmacs? (or Maxima & LyX) Andre Poenitz
- Lyx for OSX (was [OT] TeXmacs?) Jacobo Myesrton
- Re: Lyx for OSX (was [OT] TeXmacs?) Allan Rae
- Re: Embedded Python (Was: Re: [OT] TeXmacs?) Matej Cepl
- Re: Embedded Python (Was: Re: [OT] TeXmac... Rem
- Embedded Python (Was: Re: [OT] TeXmacs?) Ronald Florence
- Re: Embedded Python (Was: Re: [OT] TeXmac... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Embedded Python (Was: Re: [OT] Te... Matej Cepl
- Re[3]: [OT] TeXmacs?) Guenter Milde
- Re: [OT] TeXmacs? Juha Siltala