David Landgren wrote:
> Continuing as the devil's advocate, I still can't decide if that's just
> a parody on the whole license issue. It's just too over the top.
>
> That said, I agree that CPAN doesn't have to be the vector for
> distributing this useless drivel. While the license gave me a big laugh,
> the comments in the source code are distinctly unfunny.
In this day and age, it's not worth opening up mirror owners to lawsuits
from module authors because we think something might be a joke --
lawsuits cost you money even if you win. (Also, if this module is a
"joke"... it's really not all that funny. It's juvenile stupidity at best.)
It's ESPECIALLY not worth the legal risk for such a stupid and
controversial module. The license looks non-Free, the module sucks, so
deletion is a no-brainer. It's not worth the time spent guessing.
If licensing is the only reason for deleting this thing, then
delete first and allow the author to reupload with a Free license later.
CPAN has rules. Let's enforce them.
--
package JAPH;use Catalyst qw/-Debug/;($;=JAPH)->config(name => do {
$,.=reverse qw[Jonathan tsu rehton lre rekca Rockway][$_].[split //,
";$;"]->[$_].q; ;for 1..4;$,=~s;^.;;;$,});$;->setup;
