-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 However, if we look at C++, classes have functions as well as member variables (fields). Why shouldn't C& do the same?
Also, can we pick either MOO-Cows and Lambdamoo-server and stick with it? It seems apparent that everyone participating is on both lists. - -David Pfeffer - -----Original Message----- From: Discussion related to the MOO platform. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of H. Peter Anvin Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 5:16 PM To: Discussion related to the MOO platform. Cc: Luke-Jr; lambdamoo-server Luke-Jr wrote: > > I don't see why verbs/functions need to be treated the same as > properties. Other languages, like C, keep global variables seperate > from functions. Why would MOOcode/C& be any different? > Ahem... No it doesn't. Global variables live in the same namespace as functions in C, and that's what enables things like function pointers. -hpa -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0 iQA/AwUBPnOnu2U1FANHPcR9EQI1gACg5I3QmYun/uT7UgFeyOfXNiNRYxIAoJqz yAp6kzUV3f8FDxNK8UE1vEtj =Joqe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
