I see what you're saying. However, is it much harder to think of them as being in the same namespace, but with names like .prop or :verb required? For example, perhaps it would be a good idea to have obj:verb usable as a pointer to the verb?
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Luke-Jr wrote: > >> >> I don't see why verbs/functions need to be treated the same as >> properties. Other languages, like C, keep global variables seperate from >> functions. Why would MOOcode/C& be any different? >> > > Ahem... > > No it doesn't. Global variables live in the same namespace as > functions in C, and that's what enables things like function pointers. > > -hpa > > > ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
