Gargos Chode
Thu, 05 Oct 2000 03:02:47 -0700
-- On Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:05:14 Roel VdB wrote: >Hello Robert, > >Thursday, October 05, 2000, 12:08:21 AM, you wrote: >RH> I don't know any track where the use of -q1 improves sound quality >RH> compared to a same sized -q2. That's why I'm asking you all. > >The reason I use it on -V1 is: I don't get poorer quality (still >waiting for my one sample) and I get fairly decent size benefits, what >VBR is all about. > >On the velvet track, both -V1 -q1 and -V1 have a noise in the R >channel in MJ mode. It's not extremely harsh, and with that new >'Robert's alternate code', which I hope will be default in 3.88, the >amount of JS noise is even less. > >You could say: use -V2 instead of -V1 -q1, but I found the first >sounding less good than the latter. > >About the 'same sized': how do you get the -q1 and -q2 to be of equal >size? > >-- >Best regards, > Roel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-- >MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ ) > Hello, Have you tried using -q1 on fatboy.wav? It sounds significantly worse than -h or -q2. If you dont have this file let me know and I will send it to you. Dibrom Get your FREE Email and Voicemail at Lycos Communications at http://comm.lycos.com -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )