On Tuesday 12 November 2013 18:19:56 Marcos Douglas wrote: > > " > > with r:= rec1 do > > r.field1:= 123 > > end; > > > > with r:= rec2, s:= r.field1 do > > r.field1.field1:= 123; //or > > s.field1:= 123; > > end; > > " > > NO! Only if "r" was defined. But in that case I don't see any advantages. > > If I can vote using your options, I vote in "with r: rec1 do" sintaxe. > Agreed. :-)
Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
