Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message by default?

[adam morley]

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 02:48:27PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:29:44PM -0400, adam morley wrote:
> > 
> > my point is the reason for not violating said should clause is
> > archaic.  my reason is that if your mail reader can't handle it, step
> > into the 21st century and get a reader that knows how to wrap text.
> 
> Mail systems unpredictably truncate lines longer than (IIRC) 1023
> characters. So you're likely to have truncated paragraphs and sure to
> tick off just about everyone with your arrogant attitude. 

actually its 1000--998 + crlf.  according to the rfc

> 
> If you want to break RFCs get a job with M$, where doing so seems to
> be a good career move.

uh.  okay

> 
> -rex

-- 
thanks
adam

any and all ideas herein are the sole property of the author, with no implied 
warranties or guarantees.  unless its somebody else's already.