On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:43:58PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2001-05-11 16:02:11 -0400, adam morley wrote: > > >that is not required by rfc 2646, it is a should statment. and it > >is there for non-flow aware mail readers. we avoid this when not > >wrapping and using fixed, as it aint flowed text. > > You don't expect this to look nice in any usual mailer, do you? dont expect what again? i have a short term memory and yeah. thanks. > > -- > Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/ -- thanks adam any and all ideas herein are the sole property of the author, with no implied warranties or guarantees. unless its somebody else's already.
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Sam Roberts
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... rex
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley