On 5/2/21 12:20 AM, Adam Reviczky wrote: > Hi, > > I cannot get the signature working either, but almost certain it did > work in February this year, as I have done some with MKIV. > [...]
Hi Adam, I’m on a Linux computer, so I’m not able to check this now. If the signature isn’t working, you mean that the output PDF document from fields-007.tex cannot be signed with Acrobat DC, don’t you? Sorry for asking the obvious question, but this worked perfectly fine each time I tested. > Using the https://live.contextgarden.net/ with (LuaTeX 2.06 20200630 + > ConTeXt MkIV 2020.06.30 17:30) looks good, but evince does not display > the field. Evince never displays the signature field, only when signed. BTW, using mupdf-gl to sign the PDF document will mess it, since it has problems to recognize the child object. From my experience, only Acrobat deals with child objects in signatures generating a valid signature (and rewriting the two objects into a single one). Just in case it might help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
