On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 23:29 +0100, Adam Reviczky wrote:
> Not sure how good it is, but in the poppler discussion this site was
> mentioned to verify the signature details:  
> https://validator.docusign.com/
> 
> I have tried using with poppler's pdfsig and Okular.
> 

Oh, that's a great tool, thanks!

Leo


> Adam
> 
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 10:14 PM Leonard Janis Robert König <
> l...@ljrk.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 17:41 +0200, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On 6/7/21 10:43 PM, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote:
> > > > Hi Adam, Hi Pablo,
> > > > 
> > > > I just noticed your replies, sorry for the late answer!
> > > > 
> > > > I could sign forms with both okular as well as mupdf just fine,
> > > > although the behavior is different.  The former assumes that
> > > > the
> > > > field
> > > > is already an existing signature and segfaults when you look at
> > the
> > > > properties, but cann successfully add another signature using
> > > > the
> > > > "Tools" menu.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Pablo,
> > 
> > > I’m afraid that I don’t use Okular.
> > > 
> > > >  With the latter you can click on the form field to
> > > > trigger a menu to select the signature you want to sign with,
> > > > and
> > > > it
> > > > "replaces" the "empty" signature generated by ConTeXt.  Both
> > > > work
> > > > fine,
> > > > even with my newer ConTeXt.
> > > 
> > > mupdf-gl signs the document, but in a way that only mupdf-gl
> > > understands it.
> > > 
> > > Try to open a PDF document signed with mupdf-gl in Acrobat
> > > (Reader
> > or
> > > not). You will see that the signature is wrong.
> > 
> > Hm, I tested with Okular, Firefox and MasterPDF as I don't have
> > Acrobat
> > on Linux, and both understand the signature, which is why I thought
> > it'd be correct.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > > On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 5:50 PM Pablo Rodriguez <oi...@gmx.es>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > From my experience, only Acrobat deals with child objects
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > signatures
> > > > > > generating a valid signature (and rewriting the two objects
> > > > > > into a
> > > > > > single one).
> > > > 
> > > > As mentioned above, it seems that mupdf (now?) actually
> > > > rewrites
> > > > "both"
> > > > signatures into one, however Okular doesn't.
> > > 
> > > Sorry, objects is a very special term in PDF parlance. It has
> > nothing
> > > to
> > > do with signatures.
> > > 
> > > Just in case it might help,
> > 
> > Ah, I see.  I'm still a bit unsure what to make of the "fields
> > nested
> > in TABLEs" issue, but maybe further debugging will show at some
> > point.
> > 
> > ~ Leo
> > 
> > ___________________________________________________________________
> > __
> > ______________
> > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
> > entry to the Wiki!
> > 
> > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> > webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> > archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> > wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> > ___________________________________________________________________
> > __
> > ______________
> _____________________________________________________________________
> ______________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
> entry to the Wiki!
> 
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / 
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> _____________________________________________________________________
> ______________


___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to