+1 for me as well. I'm also behind adding support for extensions and would certainly welcome a change to pull parsing if anybody is willing enough to do the work.
alex Paul Brown wrote: >>So, given these additional elements, what do you think about my >>initial proposal (take bpel object model and parser from pxe)? I think >>it's already in a pretty good shape, which is the whole point of code >>donations, and can easily be improved to support extensions or other >>missing parts. >> >> > >Well, I'll give it a +1 and volunteer to sketch out how to add >extensions as per WS-BPEL 2.0. Are there any more or less standard >extensions that we'd want to support out of the box? > >-- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://mult.ifario.us/ > >
