Re: BPEL Object Model and Parser

[Alex Boisvert]

Paul Brown wrote:

>Well, I'll give it a +1 and volunteer to sketch out how to add
>extensions as per WS-BPEL 2.0.  Are there any more or less standard
>extensions that we'd want to support out of the box?
>  
>
<cough> atomic transactions <cough> <cough> e4x <cough!>