Hi, Alex --
Well, I'll give it a +1 and volunteer to sketch out how to add
extensions as per WS-BPEL 2.0. Are there any more or less standard
extensions that we'd want to support out of the box?
<cough> atomic transactions <cough> <cough> e4x <cough!>
Atomic transactions is a good strawman to think about -- do you have
a specific proposal? (That appendix was stricken from the spec once
upon a time.)
E4X would be supported by the standard expression language extension
point, not as an extension element or attribute.
And you should see someone about that cough... :)
Ta.
--
Paul R Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mult.ifario.us/
