Well, pull parsing was just a suggestion ...
Guillaume
Alex Boisvert wrote:
+1 for me as well. I'm also behind adding support for extensions and
would certainly welcome a change to pull parsing if anybody is willing
enough to do the work.
alex
Paul Brown wrote:
So, given these additional elements, what do you think about my
initial proposal (take bpel object model and parser from pxe)? I think
it's already in a pretty good shape, which is the whole point of code
donations, and can easily be improved to support extensions or other
missing parts.
Well, I'll give it a +1 and volunteer to sketch out how to add
extensions as per WS-BPEL 2.0. Are there any more or less standard
extensions that we'd want to support out of the box?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mult.ifario.us/
