On 6/18/2014 2:07 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Stephan Wiesand > <stephan.wies...@desy.de <mailto:stephan.wies...@desy.de>> wrote: > > Note that there are no RHEL7 binaries. The release team feels that > we should > not continue to provide packages using the old transarc paths for > new Linux > platforms, and that we should leave packaging for those to > downstream projects > rather than creating FHS compliant packages ourselves. This would > mean that > we'd no longer provide any binaries for RHEL7+ and Fedora 21+. > > > Do we want to continue development of the RPM spec file in the OpenAFS > git tree? Split off a RHEL7/Fedora version?
The consensus of the release team is that we would like some downstream packaging organization to be responsible for deciding how to package OpenAFS for their distribution. Eventually we would like there not to be packaging maintained in the OpenAFS tree. However, we will not cut off users from packaging they are already obtaining from OpenAFS.org for existing major OS revisions. Jeffrey Altman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
