On Jun 18, 2014, at 20:07 , Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Stephan Wiesand <stephan.wies...@desy.de> > wrote: > >> Note that there are no RHEL7 binaries. The release team feels that we >> should >> not continue to provide packages using the old transarc paths for new Linux >> platforms, and that we should leave packaging for those to downstream >> projects >> rather than creating FHS compliant packages ourselves. This would mean that >> we'd no longer provide any binaries for RHEL7+ and Fedora 21+. >> > > Do we want to continue development of the RPM spec file in the OpenAFS git > tree? Split off a RHEL7/Fedora version?
Interesting question. My personal opinion is that if we do it at all, yes we should forge a new spec for RHEL 7+ and Fedora 21+ which does away with all the legacy. And that it would bitrot quickly unless we actually use it. And that maintaining the spec is the bigger problem than providing the builds. Thus, probably: "No." -- Stephan Wiesand DESY -DV- Platanenenallee 6 15738 Zeuthen, Germany _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
