On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Peter Memishian wrote:
> I don't understand what the "problem" is with the way Roland has
> implemented this? Is it a _big_ problem - or is is simply your
> personal preference?
Roger (cc'd on this email) is the right person to engage for the
philosophical argument for it -- I am merely asking for consistency
with the way the rest of our Makefiles work. The changes necessary
to provide that consistency are minor and should take less than an
hour (at most) to implement.
No - no more "philosophical argument"s - if you want to ask "for
consistency" - then make the bloody changes yourself. As I said - it
would take you less time to make the changes than to type a stupid
email requesting them.
If the project is good enough to integrate - then - step aside and let
it integrate. If there is a "philosophical argument" - then follow
your own procedures and file a bug report against ksh93 *after* it
integrates.
You're being obstructionist and blocking ksh93 integration. In my book
- you're either part of the problem or part of the solution. Where do
you want to be in terms of getting ksh93 integrated (rethorical
question - don't answer).
Again, it is not about personal preference. It's about consistency and
simplicity.
Disagree strongly. It's about people with more time on their hands to
write stupid emails and block forward progress.
I don't remember ever seeing an email from you that said "Hey Roland -
I saw I problem, I checked out the file and I fixed it. Now here is
why I did that".
Regards,
Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134 Timezone: US CDT
OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005 to Mar 2007
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/ogb_2005-2007/
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
