On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Peter Memishian wrote:
> No - no more "philosophical argument"s - if you want to ask "for
> consistency" - then make the bloody changes yourself. As I said - it
> would take you less time to make the changes than to type a stupid
> email requesting them.
It is not my role as a code reviewer to go and make the changes -- nor do
I think it is appropriate. Several people -- and Roland in particular --
explicitly asked me to review the Makefiles, and I am doing that.
Further, I am doing it in my own personal time, which -- contrary to your
assertions -- is actually quite limited. It is *because* I believe ksh93
*is* important that I am spending Friday evening working on it. Frankly,
it's quite distressing to realize that my efforts are instead viewed as
"obstructionist".
OK. I had a phone call from jbeck and we had a very productive
discussion and he was able to "defuse" my frustrations while still
taking note of my point of view.
So I'm ready to drop this thread - with sincere thanks to everyone who
took the time to discuss it.
PS. I'd really rather not consume more time on this thread.
Yes - I hear and understand that!
Regards,
Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134 Timezone: US CDT
OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005 to Mar 2007
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/ogb_2005-2007/
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
