Me too, but I don't think it's against TOS. A sim owner can do what a sim owner wants, and if it's to trust client/copybot detection to an inworld device they didn't make themselves, that's not against the rules afaik. Of course, I'm completely unaware of any method that's not going to result in false positives.
I'm just posting this because I have the feeling that it's going to become far more commonplace, and this is the group of people that it's going to affect the most. So it's Emerald in the main grid for me, with my own clients on OpenSim or the beta grid from here on out. Though WHY anyone wouldn't want to come HERE to talk about client detection is far beyond my grasp. That's like AVG not wanting to talk to Microsoft. --GC On 05/01/2010 06:42 PM, Robert Martin wrote: > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Glen Canaday<gcana...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> [15:05] GC Continental: Compile it yourself - use the svn sources >> [15:05] zFire Xue: but being that I have IDed Snowglobe over 2800 times >> with the system, and then there is you, and 2 others... it doesnt look >> good that you are such a rare exception. >> [15:06] GC Continental: You'll have the same viewer I have. >> [15:06] zFire Xue: That explains how someone may have made a copybot out >> of it. >> > and most of the reason for the rarity is that most folks can't seem to > get a from source compile to actually work much less getting a SVN > copy to work. > Personally i think that any kind of ban by viewer signature device > should be banned (outside of a Linden Lab built item). > > _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
