--On Friday, March 24, 2017 5:40 PM +0000 "Salz, Rich" <rs...@akamai.com>
wrote:
The required source code disclosures of the MPL are problematic. The
fact that the MPL allows distribution under a non-patent-protecting
license is problematic.
Ok?
Thanks Rich, that's a more useful starting point. Has dual licensing been
considered? Both in 2015 and now, the lack of GPLv2 compatibility has
shown to be a serious drawback to the APLv2.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
