> > Dual licensing means that it is also available under a > > no-patent-protection license which is an issue for us. > > APLv2 and MPLv2 both have patent protections. How would a dual license of > APL+MPL result in a no-patent-protection license?
MPL allows GPL which has no patent protection. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
