> Thanks Rich, that's a more useful starting point. Has dual licensing been > considered? Both in 2015 and now, the lack of GPLv2 compatibility has > shown to be a serious drawback to the APLv2.
Dual licensing means that it is also available under a no-patent-protection license which is an issue for us. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
