--On Friday, March 24, 2017 7:47 PM +0100 Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be>
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:18:40AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Friday, March 24, 2017 6:12 PM +0000 "Salz, Rich" <rs...@akamai.com>
wrote:
> > Thanks Rich, that's a more useful starting point. Has dual licensing
> > been considered? Both in 2015 and now, the lack of GPLv2
> > compatibility has shown to be a serious drawback to the APLv2.
>
> Dual licensing means that it is also available under a
> no-patent-protection license which is an issue for us.
APLv2 and MPLv2 both have patent protections. How would a dual license
of APL+MPL result in a no-patent-protection license?
As far as I understand the MPLv2 is only compatible with the GPLv2
in a very specific case which makes it not useful for people that
would actually want to link their application with it.
Reference? I certainly don't see that in
<https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/FAQ/>
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
