how much time do spend on average evaluating software? I know in general it's usually cheaper to buy than build but sometimes the time taken to evaluate X variations is usually daunting...
On 1 June 2011 13:33, Stephen Price <step...@littlevoices.com> wrote: > For you, its the space. I guess for them, its being able to target > different clients. Pay for what you need or pay for what you can > afford. I went for the top plan because of the more machines. > > Then again I tend to buy lots of software tools. Some people go out > and spend thousands on their hardware and then refuse to spend a > single cent on software (usually because they want something for > nothing, which in the software world can sometimes be found). I don't > get that. I look at how long it would have taken me to write the > software (assuming I even have the skills for what the software does) > and then see the measly $200 or whatever as being a bargin. > Time is more valuable to me than money. I have less time than money > and I seem to spend all my time converting it into money. :) > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Greg Keogh <g...@mira.net> wrote: > > Stephen, Crashplan looked great until I noticed they have some kind of > > per-machine restriction on all but the top plan. This make no sense, as > if I > > buy the space, then I expect to be able to use from absa-bloody-lutely > > anywhere, I mean, it's the space that counts, not where it comes from -- > > Greg > > > > > -- regards, Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland