Yep, all good if that's the case On 4 Apr 2017 1:21 PM, "Stephen Price" <step...@lythixdesigns.com> wrote:
> Yep, If we keep the actual list email address consistent then all we are > changing is the implementation of said list. > > I think it's a good idea to keep the primary function of the elist as it > is. Anyone currently subscribed to the list will be on the replacement. It > should be the same list, just delivered by a different backend. > > They can remove themselves if they decide they don't like it (perhaps more > traffic isn't what they want, or it's not applicable to them anymore and > they forgot they were on it... whatever the reason). > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on > behalf of David Connors <da...@connors.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM > *To:* ozDotNet > *Subject:* Re: Ozdotnet list > > On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 13:06 Tony Wright <tonyw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That does worry me. First, I don't agree with broadening the scope of the >> list as it benefits from being niche. Secondly, moving to a new >> environment, while exciting, could spell the end of the list as many >> spectators won't bother making the move across. >> > > Probably pretty low risk if it can still function as an email list (which > doco says it does). > > > -- > David Connors > da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | LinkedIn | +61 417 189 363 >
