Yep, If we keep the actual list email address consistent then all we are changing is the implementation of said list.
I think it's a good idea to keep the primary function of the elist as it is. Anyone currently subscribed to the list will be on the replacement. It should be the same list, just delivered by a different backend. They can remove themselves if they decide they don't like it (perhaps more traffic isn't what they want, or it's not applicable to them anymore and they forgot they were on it... whatever the reason). ________________________________ From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf of David Connors <da...@connors.com> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 13:06 Tony Wright <tonyw...@gmail.com<mailto:tonyw...@gmail.com>> wrote: That does worry me. First, I don't agree with broadening the scope of the list as it benefits from being niche. Secondly, moving to a new environment, while exciting, could spell the end of the list as many spectators won't bother making the move across. Probably pretty low risk if it can still function as an email list (which doco says it does). -- David Connors da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | LinkedIn | +61 417 189 363
