Mike wrote: > It's an ACTUAL EXAMPLE. She's a real person. She exists. I've known her for > most of my life. And if you'll recall the original post, I stated that she > refuses to switch to digital, because she is comfortable with her > point-and-shoot camera, happy with her drugstore prints, not willing to > learn how to use the new technology, and well enough off to spend the money > she spends for film and processing without giving it much thought.
I'm not denying she is a real person. I just don't think person is very representative... > > That doesn't mean the potential for savings are not there. The potential is there. I just think that potential for spending more is more likely for most people... Pål
