Well,

Got the K100d, FA50mm and DA40mm last week. So far, I've taken about
300 pictures. Here are some comments...

FA50 is great. So much better than the old M50... Truly great to have
autofocus capability in low-light situations. The old M50 was
IMPOSSIBLE to focus on the DL. Lens lookes cheaply made judging by the
pics I'd seen. While the aperture ring feels AWFUL (cheap and fragile)
in use, it's a non-issue as the lens sits on the A setting all the
time. The rest of the lens looks and feels good. MF is nice and
smooth, not at all the crappy feel of the kit lens focusing ring.
Image quality if of course excellent. Focus speed is very good.

DA40mm is very impressive to see. It really is tiny. F/2.8 is far too
slow to use indoors. Lens cap is as annoying as everyone says it is.
I've missed a few good shots because I had to sit there and unscrew
the cap. Construction is good. MF feels OK. Focal length is...
strange. A bit too wide for my tastes. I dunno. Using this lens makes
it a challenge to get nice composition. I haven't taken many shots in
my life but I have a nagging thought that I prefer telephoto. I don't
know. Maybe it's a good thing... no need spend money on the FA28mm.
But then, I've never been out and about with my DSLRs so I haven't had
the chance to do landscape or architectural shots of any kind. Image
quality has been pretty nice. So far. I don't know what I was worried
about. Verdict? We'll see. AF speed is VERY QUICK (obviously)

K100d.... Excellent camera.
-Redesigned casing makes for a better grip. Not as good as a larger
camera (right hand pinky still has nowhere to go) but the grip is
slightly thicker and the redesigned profile makes it easier to hold.

-Some nice usability upgrades! OK button when shooting will show ISO
in the VF, slightly more customizable options in the Custom menu... I
like it so far.

-JPEG quality compared to the DL == No contest. I don't like to
post-process. The camera's JPEGs are sharper and have very nice,
punchy colors, which is what I like. No complaints! The result is that
I can shoot JPEG in any situation now, whereas the DL would only give
good results in certain conditions in JPEG.

-Shake reduction... AWESOME. Shots as low as 1/15 of a second (with
50mm lens) and pretty much a sure bet. I've gotten sharp pics to as
low as 0.3 seconds, but at that speed it's hit or miss and depends on
your own hands' stability more than anything else

-Battery life - about 400 shots on low-quality 2300mah NIMHs. No
complaints. Batteries cost a dollar a piece.

-Focus speed: Much improved. Still not that quick in low-light
situations but much better than the DL. Where the DL would hunt
interminably at low-light, (hunt, overshoot, hunt, overshoot, hunt,
lock) the k100d will lock in more quickly (hunt, lock). Good lighting
AF is much quicker than DL. Maybe the motor has been beefed up, or is
simply being spun faster because the camera can keep up with it now.
Multi-point AF is still as useless as ever. I think i'll set it to
center-point.

-Burst mode doesn't seem to be any faster than the DL. But I don't care.

-Shutter (mirror slap) sounds nicer than the DL. A much more damped,
high-quality sound. AF sounds nicer too. Sounds like there's less
slack between gear teeth. (i don't know if the AF shaft is
gear-driven, but that's what it sounds like).

-Camera interface: Pretty much the same, but I've noticed images are
quicker to load (playback mode). There is also a very quick fade
effect when loading a new pic. Very subtle but does a lot to improve
the 'feel' of the camera. Makes it appear more responsive.

-LCD: Much improved. Better/deeper colors and much better viewing angle.

-Pop-up flash is slightly taller. Maybe this helps with redeye.

Verdict: If you have a low-end *ist-Dx series cam (basically, any
pentamirror *istDx) do not hesitate... Sell it immediately while you
can get some good money and upgrade to the k100d. I sold my DL
body-only for $300 bucks (USD). For $435, and 50$ rebate, the K100d is
a NO BRAINER.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to