Detailed report Alex!!!

On the DA40, store that nice screw cap with your socks and replace it
with the cap from a Fuji filmbox, it pops right in and you won't lose
any more shots ;-)



On 5/3/07, AlexG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well,
>
> Got the K100d, FA50mm and DA40mm last week. So far, I've taken about
> 300 pictures. Here are some comments...
>
> FA50 is great. So much better than the old M50... Truly great to have
> autofocus capability in low-light situations. The old M50 was
> IMPOSSIBLE to focus on the DL. Lens lookes cheaply made judging by the
> pics I'd seen. While the aperture ring feels AWFUL (cheap and fragile)
> in use, it's a non-issue as the lens sits on the A setting all the
> time. The rest of the lens looks and feels good. MF is nice and
> smooth, not at all the crappy feel of the kit lens focusing ring.
> Image quality if of course excellent. Focus speed is very good.
>
> DA40mm is very impressive to see. It really is tiny. F/2.8 is far too
> slow to use indoors. Lens cap is as annoying as everyone says it is.
> I've missed a few good shots because I had to sit there and unscrew
> the cap. Construction is good. MF feels OK. Focal length is...
> strange. A bit too wide for my tastes. I dunno. Using this lens makes
> it a challenge to get nice composition. I haven't taken many shots in
> my life but I have a nagging thought that I prefer telephoto. I don't
> know. Maybe it's a good thing... no need spend money on the FA28mm.
> But then, I've never been out and about with my DSLRs so I haven't had
> the chance to do landscape or architectural shots of any kind. Image
> quality has been pretty nice. So far. I don't know what I was worried
> about. Verdict? We'll see. AF speed is VERY QUICK (obviously)
>
> K100d.... Excellent camera.
> -Redesigned casing makes for a better grip. Not as good as a larger
> camera (right hand pinky still has nowhere to go) but the grip is
> slightly thicker and the redesigned profile makes it easier to hold.
>
> -Some nice usability upgrades! OK button when shooting will show ISO
> in the VF, slightly more customizable options in the Custom menu... I
> like it so far.
>
> -JPEG quality compared to the DL == No contest. I don't like to
> post-process. The camera's JPEGs are sharper and have very nice,
> punchy colors, which is what I like. No complaints! The result is that
> I can shoot JPEG in any situation now, whereas the DL would only give
> good results in certain conditions in JPEG.
>
> -Shake reduction... AWESOME. Shots as low as 1/15 of a second (with
> 50mm lens) and pretty much a sure bet. I've gotten sharp pics to as
> low as 0.3 seconds, but at that speed it's hit or miss and depends on
> your own hands' stability more than anything else
>
> -Battery life - about 400 shots on low-quality 2300mah NIMHs. No
> complaints. Batteries cost a dollar a piece.
>
> -Focus speed: Much improved. Still not that quick in low-light
> situations but much better than the DL. Where the DL would hunt
> interminably at low-light, (hunt, overshoot, hunt, overshoot, hunt,
> lock) the k100d will lock in more quickly (hunt, lock). Good lighting
> AF is much quicker than DL. Maybe the motor has been beefed up, or is
> simply being spun faster because the camera can keep up with it now.
> Multi-point AF is still as useless as ever. I think i'll set it to
> center-point.
>
> -Burst mode doesn't seem to be any faster than the DL. But I don't care.
>
> -Shutter (mirror slap) sounds nicer than the DL. A much more damped,
> high-quality sound. AF sounds nicer too. Sounds like there's less
> slack between gear teeth. (i don't know if the AF shaft is
> gear-driven, but that's what it sounds like).
>
> -Camera interface: Pretty much the same, but I've noticed images are
> quicker to load (playback mode). There is also a very quick fade
> effect when loading a new pic. Very subtle but does a lot to improve
> the 'feel' of the camera. Makes it appear more responsive.
>
> -LCD: Much improved. Better/deeper colors and much better viewing angle.
>
> -Pop-up flash is slightly taller. Maybe this helps with redeye.
>
> Verdict: If you have a low-end *ist-Dx series cam (basically, any
> pentamirror *istDx) do not hesitate... Sell it immediately while you
> can get some good money and upgrade to the k100d. I sold my DL
> body-only for $300 bucks (USD). For $435, and 50$ rebate, the K100d is
> a NO BRAINER.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to