2010/4/20 Schwab,Wilhelm K <bsch...@anest.ufl.edu> > Mariano, > > FFI, use of OS threads and callbacks are *very* basic needs that we should > support. IMHO, we should be focused on making them work, not on classifying > what is internal or external. >
But is has nothing to do with what Stef asked: "Do we add FFI by* default *in 1.1?" In my opinion, it shouldn't be by default. However, this doesn't mean that we don't support FFI. And I am not saying to focus in internal or external. I just answer Stef question with my opinion. Cheers Mariano > Bill > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto: > pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] *On Behalf Of *Mariano > Martinez Peck > *Sent:* Monday, April 19, 2010 9:49 PM > *To:* Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-project] FFI in 1.1 > > > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Stéphane Ducasse < > stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> Do we add FFI by default in 1.1? >> > > Noooooooooo!!! > > I wouldn't include neither FFI or Alien FFI in neither PharoCore or > PharoDev image. > > FFI is an EXTERNAL package, NOT core, neither a dev tool. > > That's only my opinion. > > Cheers > > Mariano > > >> This was the plan so. >> >> Stef >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
