2010/9/1 Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez <miguel.c...@gmail.com>

> El mié, 01-09-2010 a las 15:44 +0900, Serge Stinckwich escribió:
> > Don't confuse open-source software with free software:
> >
> > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html
>
> I think that this has already gone off-topic. The original argument was
> that Andreas wanted to open source it (MIT likely) and at the same time
> prohibiting forking of the codebase.
> My point was that if it was open source or free software then the
> forking was a granted right.
> If he wanted to avoid it then he couldn't claim is free software or open
> source.
>
> With MIT you can fork (of course) but also with GPL (like the
> emacs/xemacs fork).
>
> Let not bring this thread in a free software vs open source war.
>


+1


Laurent Laffont

http://pharocasts.blogspot.com/
http://magaloma.blogspot.com/


>
> Cheers
> >
> >
> > 2010/8/31 Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez <miguel.c...@gmail.com>:
> > > El mar, 31-08-2010 a las 00:43 +0200, Levente Uzonyi escribió:
> > >> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > El mar, 31-08-2010 a las 00:25 +0200, Levente Uzonyi escribió:
> > >> > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Friedrich Dominicus wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Levente Uzonyi <le...@elte.hu> writes:
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> I suggest that the people that want and know, group together
> and build an open-source one.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Why do you have to have your "own" library?
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Did I say "pharo library"? reread carefully I said an
> "open-source one".
> > >> > >
> > >> > > What I get from Andreas' words is that he's willing to make it
> open
> > >> > > source if it won't be forked.
> > >> > Hm I think this is impossible. If it's OS it's up to whomever get
> its
> > >> > hand on it. Or am I mistaken?
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Just think about GPL, it's open source, but you can't fork the code
> if you
> > >> > don't release your changes as GPL too.
> > >>
> > >> "I don't get it. If it  is open source then is forkable. Period.
> > >> If it is a special case like GPL, it add some other restriction, like
> > >> you can't redistribute the new code without it being also GPL. You can
> > >> fork it and not using GPL for the new changes, the restriction is that
> > >> you can't redistribute it."
> > >>
> > >> From wikipedia: "Open-source software (OSS) is computer software that
> is
> > >> available in source code form for which the source code and certain
> other
> > >> rights normally reserved for copyright holders are provided under a
> > >> software license that permits users to study, change, and improve the
> > >> software."
> > >>
> > >> There's nothing about forking or redistributing here. I could make a
> > >> license that says: you can study, change and improve the software, but
> > >> you can't redistribute it without my permission.
> > >>
> > >> "But the fact remains that it is forkable always. If you don't want it
> > >> forkable, then use other non open source license."
> > >>
> > >> See above. You could "fork" it, but that wouldn't be open source
> anymore.
> > >>
> > >
> > > You must be kidding. The freedom to fork is a essential right of open
> > > source software:
> > > http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10379280-16.html
> > >
> > > http://asay.blogspot.com/2006/10/wither-right-to-fork.html
> > >
> > > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
> > > http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd
> > > http://www.opensource.org/node/357
> > >
> > > period.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Levente
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Cheers
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Levente
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards
> > >> > Friedrich
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Q-Software Solutions GmbH; Sitz: Bruchsal; Registergericht: Mannheim
> > >> > Registriernummer: HRB232138; Geschaeftsfuehrer: Friedrich Dominicus
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > >> > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> > >> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > >> > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project
> mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Miguel Cobá
> > >> http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Pharo-project mailing list
> > >> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> > >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > >> _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing
> list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > >
> > > --
> > > Miguel Cobá
> > > http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Serge Stinckwich
> > UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam
> > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
> > http://doesnotunderstand.org/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> --
> Miguel Cobá
> http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to