On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 02:53:17PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Jacob Meuser <jake...@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote: > > > just curious, what ports actually *need* esound? I would be willing > > to convert them to sndio so we can toss this garbage in the dumpster > > where it belongs. > > For me, esound's attraction has always been the ability to carry > audio over the network.
jack has network support, and new versions supports CELT. supposedly it's reliable enough that it can even be used over DSL. > Firefox has an esound run dependency whose use I don't know. I'm not opposed to keeping things around if they are *needed*. but we don't need 4 different audio backends in every port. -- jake...@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org