I am pretty sure you can do those things with apache too :) . I was under the impression that nginx is easier to setup and faster/lighter weight for things specific to web applications.
My experience has been that apache configs don't fit my brain all that well, whereas I found nginx configuration to be fairly straightforward for the most part. On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Terry Schmitt <tschm...@schmittworks.com> wrote: > Krishnakant, > I can't speak to the best method with Pylons, as I'm just learning > Python and Pylons, but to me, the main benefit of using Nginx and > reverse proxy is: > 1. You can load balance between several instances of your pylons app. > 2. Nginx can serve all your static content for you, which reduces the > load on the app server. > > Thanks, > Terry > > ---------------------- > Thanks, but what bennifit will we get by reverce proxy with nginx? > Isn't there a way like apache uses mod_python? > Happy hacking. > Krishnakant. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pylons-discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to pylons-disc...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en. > > -- Thomas G. Willis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-disc...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
