>> <rant>
>> You probably forget the inevitable British resistance to change. 
>> How
>> long have we been "thinking" of going metric?
>
> We actually went metric on 1 July 1959 when:
>
>     The yard was redefined as 0.9144 metre /exactly/[1]
> and
>     The pound was redefined as 0.45359237 kilogram /exactly/
>
> ie the yard and pound since 01 July 1959 have been defined in 
> /exact/ terms
> of the metre and kilogram - not exact multiples of 10 I grant you, 
> but
> defined /exactly/ none-the-less.

> Just I expect nobody noticed - like normal.
Gone metric in 1959 and nearly 50 years later - hardly aybody's 
noticed. Sounds about right.

So for about the next 40 to 50 years we carried on expecting a pint of 
milk, a pint of beer, filling station pumps deliver litres of petrol 
and we still think "miles per gallon", ask for a quarter of a pound of 
sweets or cooked meat in shops, road signs in miles or miles per hour, 
speedometers predominantly in mph.

Start a rumour that Brussels will soon metricate time and people will 
panic and believe you!

Shall we ponder how this rumour will work? Start with clock faces 
changing from 1-12 to 1-10. Work out the number of seconds per day, 
all months same length (can't have 12), adjust the years so we don't 
need leap years every 4 years (forget about how leap years vary at the 
turn of the century). Ah, hang on, slight problem, I don't think the 
earth's orbit around the sun (or is the other way around???) is 
accurate enough ;-)

Let's get this rumour started. Marcel will now program this new 
official metric time into SMSQ/E by 1st April next year! And he 
thought Easyptr 4 was "fun". Well, he never could resist responding to 
a challenge ;-)

Hmmm, insanity has definitely set in here, time to give up for today I 
think.

-- 
Dilwyn Jones 



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 22/09/2006

_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to